Cotton v. Cruden et al
| Julie Cotton |
| Brown & Brown Insurance of Nevada, Inc., Brown & Brown, Inc., Brian Cruden, Clara Cruden and Dave Lester |
| 2:2017cv03087 |
| December 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE on ECF No. 38 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting ECF No. 34 Joint Stipulation and Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting ECF No. 27 Request for Permission to Appear Telephonically at Motion Hearing on 5/18/2018. The call-in telephone number is (888)273-3658, access code: 3912597. The call must be made five minutes prior to the hear ing time. The court will join the call and convene the proceedings. The call must be made on a land line. The use of a cell phone or speaker phone during the proceedings is prohibited. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
