Aguilar-Giles v. Cardenas Markets, Inc.
| Marlene Aguilar-Giles |
| Cardenas Markets, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv03096 |
| December 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER that Cardenas Markets, Inc. shall deliver to my chambers a copy of the video footage of the incident on or before 8/30/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs counsel must meet and confer with defense counsel prior to refiling any motion for attorneys fees. A refiling of this motion must include adequ ate documentation that counsel met and conferred in a meaningful attempt to resolve this matter without judicial intervention. FURTHER ORDERED that any future motion for attorney's fees must comply with Local Rule 54-14(d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 36 Motion to Shorten Time. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's subpoena to produce documents is STAYED pending the resolution of the motion for protective order (ECF No. 35 ). FURTHER ORDERED that defendant must serve a copy of this order on Argonaut and file proof of service by August 28, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Motion to Shorten Time.FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for a protective order (ECF No. 24 ) shall be briefed on the following schedule:Deadline to file a response: July 20, 2018.Deadline to file a reply: July 24, 2018. FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument on the motion for a protective order (ECF No. 24 ) is set for July 27, 2018 at 9:30 a.m., in Las Vegas Courtroom 3C, before Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Extend Discovery. Discovery due by 8/17/2018. Motions due by 9/17/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aguilar-Giles v. Cardenas Markets, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marlene Aguilar-Giles | |
| Represented By: | Mark Hutchings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cardenas Markets, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael P Lowry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
