Howell v. Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC et al
Robert M. Howell |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC |
2:2018cv00103 |
January 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
George Foley |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that on or before 1/31/19, the parties shall file a stipulation to dismiss defendant Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC or a status report regarding settlement. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to file Dispositive Motions. Motions due by 10/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 15 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Robert Howell and defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall file either a stipulation to dismiss or a status report on or before 8/13/18. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 14 ORDER for Stipulation of Dismissal or Status Report. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.