Reed v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
| Robert Reed |
| Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC and Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00146 |
| January 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice as to Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 First Stipulation for Extension of Time re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 12/3/2018. Motions due by 1/2/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Granting 5 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re: 1 Complaint. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. answer due 3/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
