Palovich v. Gentry
Joseph Palovich |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry |
2:2018cv00240 |
February 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Peggy A. Leen |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 7 petitioner's motion to stay is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that [5 ] respondents' motion for compliance is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE 1 the petition on the respondents.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tha t the parties SHALL SEND courtesy copies of all exhibits in this case to the Clerk of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, directed to the attention of "Staff Attorney" on the outside of the mailing address label. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.