Qazi v. State of Nevada
| Omar Qazi |
| Adam P Laxalt and State of Nevada |
| 2:2018cv00291 |
| February 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER that petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment is GRANTED, and the judgment entered on February 20, 2018 is hereby VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED that the amended petition (ECF No. 6 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subj ect matter jurisdiction.FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice, and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER that this action is dismissed without prejudice and a certificate of appealability is denied. The Clerk shall add Nevada Attorney General Adam P. Laxalt as counsel for respondents. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - prisoner IFP/Habeas instructions/forms, copies of documents 1 and 2 mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
