Cannon v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Patrick Cannon
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2018cv00470
Filed: March 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 27 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered 6/28/2019, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 24 Defend ant's Cross-motion to Affirm is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Granting 22 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 17 Motion to Remand to Agency (Third Request). Responses due by 1/29/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 17 Motion to Remand to Agency (Second Request). Responses due by 1/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 17 Motion to Remand to Agency (First Request). Responses due by 12/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Granting 15 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Motion for Remand/Reversal (First Request). Motions due by 10/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court must file the Complaint.The Clerk of the Court must serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail. The Clerk of Court must issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - MR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannon v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Cannon
Represented By: Cyrus Safa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?