Bird-B-Gone, Inc. v. Haierc Industry Co., Ltd.
Bird-B-Gone, Inc. |
Haierc Industry Co., Ltd. |
Robert D. Fish and John van Loben Sels |
2:2018cv00819 |
May 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Robert C. Jones |
Nancy J. Koppe |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION re ECF No. 27 Order granting permanent injunction. (See pdf Order for specifics.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 27 ORDER that the motion for default judgment and permanent injunction (ECF No. 19 ) is GRANTED; A separate permanent injunction order will issue; Bird-B-Gone is hereby awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $62,742.24. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 14 ORDER that Plaintiff shall file either a motion for default or a status report by 7/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting ECF No. 10 Stipulation regarding Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint (ECF No. 1 ). Defendant's answer/response due by 6/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.