Gayle v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Tracy Gayle |
| Bank of America, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon, Clear Recon Corporation, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-AR8, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, ReconTrust Company, N.A.. and SBMC |
| 2:2018cv00913 |
| May 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 23 the motion to dismiss is granted. Clear Recon's joinder 27 is likewise granted. Second Amended Complaint deadline: 4/17/2019. See Order for specifications. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to defendant SBMC. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 13 plaintiff Tracy Gayle's motion for a temporary restraining order and 14 motion for a preliminary injunction are DENIED without prejudice to Gayle filing a new motion showing the need for injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
