Pendleton et al v. GMA Investments, LLC, et al
| Xanadu Stamenkovic, Silvia Green, Melanie Johnson, Megan Pendleton, Ken Halley, Renee Green, Ramon Torrez, Orerbis Carbonell, Theodora Cork and Lauren Martell |
| GMA Investments, LLC and Anthony Guadagna |
| 2:2018cv01181 |
| June 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to GMA Investments, LLC, Anthony Guadagna re #1 Complaint. (MMM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5140232) by Ramon Torrez, Lauren Martell, Renee Green, Xanadu Stamenkovic, Melanie Johnson, Orerbis Carbonell, Silvia Green, Ken Halley, Megan Pendleton, Theodora Cork. Proof of service due by 9/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons GMA Investments, LLC dba Summit Receivables, #3 Summons Anthony Guadagna)(Hernandez, Kevin) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (MMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
