Estate of Caleb Blaylock et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Stephen Patrick Blaylock, Rosalind Rose Blaylock and Estate of Caleb Blaylock |
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Joseph Lombardo and William Pollock |
2:2018cv01265 |
July 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Peggy A Leen |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rosalind Rose Blaylock, Stephen Patrick Blaylock, Estate of Caleb Blaylock, by and through special administrator Rosalind Rose Blaylock that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. (Bisson, Mitchell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5154322) by Estate of Caleb Blaylock, by and through special administrator Rosalind Rose Blaylock, Stephen Patrick Blaylock, Rosalind Rose Blaylock. Proof of service due by 10/9/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bisson, Mitchell) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.