Perez-Sanchez et al v. Sumitomo Rubber Industries LTD et al
Andrea A Avila-Pererz and Maria A Perez-Sanchez |
Sumitomo Rubber North American Inc., Sumitomo Rubber(Thailand) Co. Ltd., Sumitomo Rubber Industries LTD and Tire Xpress Inc. |
2:2018cv01278 |
July 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
James C Mahan |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 7/12/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/27/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-17-761291-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5156376) by Sumitomo Rubber North American Inc., Sumitomo Rubber Industries LTD,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dickinson, Bruce) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.