Hill v. Geico Casualty Insurance Company
| Santoro Hill |
| Geico Casualty Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv01328 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A Leen |
| James C Mahan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Dean Y. Kajioka withdrawn from the case.The plaintiff shall have until 9/21/18 in which to retain substitute counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Santoro Hill - ADR)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Dean Y. Kajioka, Esq. for Plaintiff Santoro Hill. (Kajioka, Dean) |
| Filing 6 First Joint Status Report by Plaintiff Santoro Hill. (Kajioka, Dean) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 7/20/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal, filed by Geico Casualty Insurance Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/3/2018.(Kelley, Bruce) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Geico Casualty Insurance Company. (Kelley, Bruce) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Geico Casualty Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kelley, Bruce) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-18-776290-c, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5164651) by Geico Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelley, Bruce) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. Geico Casualty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Santoro Hill | |
| Represented By: | Dean Y. Kajioka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geico Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Bruce W. Kelley |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Winner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
