Johnson v. Hooters, Inc. et al
| Steven Johnson |
| Hooters, Inc., Hooters Casino Hotel, Hooters of America, LLC, Navegante Group, Inc. and Trinity Hotel Investors, LLC |
| 2:2018cv01381 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Peggy A Leen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Andrew Williams to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. For your convenience, click on the following link to obtain the form from the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Upon approval of the Verified Petition, counsel is required to register for the Court's Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system and the electronic service of documents. Please visit the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 9/9/2018. (no image attached) (ADR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400) by Steven Johnson. Proof of service due by 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt No. NVLAS058350)(ADR) |
| Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
