Dominguez v. GEICO Casualty Company
Plaintiff: Lesly Dominguez
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv01465
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Referring Judge: James C Mahan
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2018 Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Kelley, Bruce)
September 7, 2018 Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Holt, Danielle)
August 15, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #5 Minute Order Removal Case, by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Kelley, Bruce)
August 9, 2018 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Attorney's account information is different from the address information contained in the Complaint, located within document No. #1 . Attorney Matthew P. Pawlowski is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (TR)
August 8, 2018 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 8/8/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/23/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
August 8, 2018 Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal, filed by GEICO Casualty Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/22/2018.(Kelley, Bruce) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
August 8, 2018 Filing 3 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Kelley, Bruce)
August 8, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Casualty Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kelley, Bruce)
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-18-777182-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5188145) by GEICO Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelley, Bruce) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
August 8, 2018 Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (MR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dominguez v. GEICO Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lesly Dominguez
Represented By: Matthew P. Pawlowski
Represented By: Robert J Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company
Represented By: Bruce W. Kelley
Represented By: Thomas E. Winner
Represented By: Danielle Holt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?