Mitchell v. Berryhill
| Stephanie Mitchell |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv01501 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| George Foley |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Stephanie Mitchell. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Harris, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT re #3 Complaint and #4 Summons Issued as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel. (MMM) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPTS #3 Complaint and re #4 Summons Issued as to US Attorney General. (MMM) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Elizabeth M Firer on behalf of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Firer, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed. US Attorney for the District of Nevada served on 8/17/2018. (MMM) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS re #3 Complaint and #4 Summons Issued as to USA mailed to Attorney General of the United States and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel. (MMM) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada and U.S. Attorney General. (MMM) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (Filing fee $400 - NOT paid, ifp granted) by Stephanie Mitchell. (MMM) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/16/2018 - nef regenerated) (MMM). |
Filing 2
ORDER that #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall file the Complaint, serve the Commissioner of Social Security Administration via certified mail, and shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada, and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have sixty (60) days from the date of service to file their answer or responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (DKJ) |
| Filing 1 First MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephanie Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Harris, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephanie Mitchell | |
| Represented By: | Joshua R Harris |
| Represented By: | Richard A Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth M Firer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
