Calvillo v. Paik et al
Plaintiff: Jaime Calvillo
Defendant: Steve Paik, CVSM, LLC and James Mcginnis
Case Number: 2:2018cv01580
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Referring Judge: James C Mahan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2018 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/15/2018. Given the upcoming Early Neutral Evaluation conference date, IT IS ORDERED that responses to #10 Motion for an Exemption to the Personal Attendance Requirement for James McGinnis are due by 10/19/2018. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LAA)
October 13, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION Relief From Personal Attendance Requirement by Defendant James McGinnis. Responses due by 10/27/2018. (Johnson, H.)
August 24, 2018 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jaime Calvillo. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kang, Patrick)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Scheduling Early Neutral Evaluation session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 10/29/2018 at 08:30 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 22, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by CVSM, LLC, James McGinnis, Steve Paik. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 10/6/2018.(Johnson, H.) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
August 22, 2018 Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants CVSM, LLC, James McGinnis, Steve Paik. (Johnson, H.)
August 22, 2018 Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule IC 2-1: that Kevin Johnson is in violation of Local Rule IC 2-1. Participation in the electronic filing system became mandatory for all attorneys effective January 1, 2006. You are required to register to file documents electronically in the Court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF) and the electronic service of pleadings and other papers. Please visit the Court's website at #www.nvd.uscourts.gov to complete the registration for CM/ECF. (no image attached) (DKJ)
August 22, 2018 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 8/22/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/6/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
August 21, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (MR)
August 21, 2018 Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (MR)
August 21, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by CVSM, LLC, James Mcginnis, Steve Paik. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Johnson, H.)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-18-777417-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5207058) by James Mcginnis, Steve Paik, CVSM, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, Complaint, and all filings from State Court, #2 Exhibit Notice to State Court of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court)(Johnson, H.) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calvillo v. Paik et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Paik
Represented By: H. Stan Johnson
Represented By: Kevin Johnson
Represented By: Kevin M. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVSM, LLC
Represented By: H. Stan Johnson
Represented By: Kevin Johnson
Represented By: Kevin M. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Mcginnis
Represented By: H. Stan Johnson
Represented By: Kevin Johnson
Represented By: Kevin M. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaime Calvillo
Represented By: Patrick W Kang
Represented By: Kyle R. Tatum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?