Federal National Mortgage Association et al v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
Federal Housing Finance Agency and Federal National Mortgage Association |
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
2:2018cv01584 |
August 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
George Foley |
Gloria M Navarro |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER that #6 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs and #7 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to #7 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC. (Hanks, Karen) |
Filing 11 ERROR: Wrong event selected by attorney Karen L. Hanks. CORRECTION: Document terminated as filed in error. Attorney refiled document correctly as #12 Reply. RESPONSE to #7 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs ; filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC. Replies due by 10/12/2018. (Hanks, Karen) Modified on 10/9/2018 (RFJ). |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to #6 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC. (Hanks, Karen) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #6 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs, #7 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs by Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association. (Sassi, Anthony) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent SFR Investments, LLC for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC added. (Ebron, Diana) |
Filing 7 SECOND MOTION for Demand for Security of Costs; filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC. Responses due by 9/28/2018.(Ebron, Diana) |
Filing 6 FIRST MOTION for Demand for Security of Costs; filed by Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC. Responses due by 9/28/2018.(Ebron, Diana) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service re #1 Complaint,, #2 Summons Issued by Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association. (Sassi, Anthony) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Federal National Mortgage Association. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Sassi, Anthony) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/23/2018. By Deputy Clerk: Aaron Blazevich.This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Chief Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC re #1 Complaint. (SLD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5207976) by Federal National Mortgage Association. Proof of service due by 11/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons.SFR)(Sassi, Anthony) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.