Ransom v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Nancy Ransom
Defendant: Edgar Zelaya and CRST Expedited, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv01751
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Referring Judge: James C Mahan
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 1, 2018 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal without Prejudice by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., Edgar Zelaya. (Russell, Howard)
September 25, 2018 Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., Edgar Zelaya. (Russell, Howard)
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., Edgar Zelaya. Responses due by 10/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Rodriguez, Marisa)
September 10, 2018 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 9/10/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/25/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
September 10, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by CRST Expedited, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Admiralty Holdings, Inc. for CRST Expedited, Inc. added. (Russell, Howard)
September 10, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-18-779585-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5234267) by Edgar Zelaya, CRST Expedited, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Russell, Howard) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 10, 2018 Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (ADR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ransom v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Ransom
Represented By: Daniel E. Carvalho
Represented By: Andrew D Sedlock
Represented By: Marc C. Naron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edgar Zelaya
Represented By: Marisa Rodriguez
Represented By: Howard J. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRST Expedited, Inc.
Represented By: Howard J. Russell
Represented By: Marisa Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?