Quinn v. Navient
Plaintiff: Grace Quinn
Defendant: Navient
Case Number: 2:2018cv01792
Filed: September 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Richard F Boulware
Referring Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Navient. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/13/2018.(Ayers, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Stipulation; Navient answer due 10/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
October 10, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Navient. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case Corporate Parent Navient Corporation added (Ayers, Michael) Modified on 10/11/2018 to add corporate parent (DKJ).
October 10, 2018 Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Deadline for Navient to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to #1 Complaint, by Defendant Navient. (Ayers, Michael)
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Plaintiff Grace Quinn. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Krieger, David)
September 17, 2018 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #2 . The wrong document is attached to #2 Certificate of Interested parties. Counsel is advised to file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #2 . (no image attached) (DKJ)
September 17, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Navient. (JM)
September 17, 2018 Filing 2 View #5 correct image re CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Grace Quinn. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) Modified on 9/17/2018 (DKJ).
September 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5242824) by Grace Quinn. Proof of service due by 12/16/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Navient)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 17, 2018 Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (JM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quinn v. Navient
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grace Quinn
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navient
Represented By: John J. Savage
Represented By: James W Puzey
Represented By: Michael R. Ayers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?