Quinn v. Navient
Grace Quinn |
Navient |
2:2018cv01792 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
George Foley |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Navient. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/13/2018.(Ayers, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Stipulation; Navient answer due 10/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Navient. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case Corporate Parent Navient Corporation added (Ayers, Michael) Modified on 10/11/2018 to add corporate parent (DKJ). |
Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Deadline for Navient to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to #1 Complaint, by Defendant Navient. (Ayers, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Plaintiff Grace Quinn. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Krieger, David) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #2 . The wrong document is attached to #2 Certificate of Interested parties. Counsel is advised to file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #2 . (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Navient. (JM) |
Filing 2 View #5 correct image re CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Grace Quinn. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) Modified on 9/17/2018 (DKJ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5242824) by Grace Quinn. Proof of service due by 12/16/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Navient)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Quinn v. Navient | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Grace Quinn | |
Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Navient | |
Represented By: | John J. Savage |
Represented By: | James W Puzey |
Represented By: | Michael R. Ayers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.