Diaz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc
Plaintiff: Rhea Diaz
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc
Case Number: 2:2018cv01797
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Referring Judge: Carl W Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting #6 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/23/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
October 23, 2018 Filing 6 Joint STIPULATION of Dismissal by Plaintiff Rhea Diaz. (Krieger, David)
October 10, 2018 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Experian Information Solutions, Inc that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate Vantagescore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc added. (Sharples, Andrew)
October 10, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/24/2018.(Sharples, Andrew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 18, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (JM)
September 18, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rhea Diaz. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David)
September 18, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5244457) by Rhea Diaz. Proof of service due by 12/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Experian)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 18, 2018 Case assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (JM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc
Represented By: Jennifer L Braster
Represented By: Katherine A. Neben
Represented By: Andrew J Sharples
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhea Diaz
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?