Sears v. Seterus, Inc
Plaintiff: Christina L. Sears
Defendant: Seterus, Inc
Case Number: 2:2018cv01820
Filed: September 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Referring Judge: Gloria M Navarro
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Defendant Seterus, Inc. Responses due by 11/29/2018. (Hernandez, Ramir)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Seterus, Inc answer due 11/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
October 16, 2018 Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Responsive Pleading re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Seterus, Inc. (Hernandez, Ramir)
October 2, 2018 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Seterus, Inc. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hernandez, Ramir)
October 2, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ramir Mitchell Hernandez on behalf of Defendant Seterus, Inc. (Hernandez, Ramir)
September 21, 2018 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/21/2018. By Deputy Clerk: Aaron Blazevich.This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Chief Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
September 20, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Seterus, Inc re #1 Complaint. (MR)
September 20, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Christina L. Sears. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David)
September 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5249014) by Christina L. Sears. Proof of service due by 12/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Seterus)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
September 20, 2018 Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (MR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sears v. Seterus, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina L. Sears
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Represented By: Shawn Wayne Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seterus, Inc
Represented By: Ramir Mitchell Hernandez
Represented By: Christopher A.J. Swift
Represented By: Ace Clinton Van Patten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?