Reed v. North Las Vegas Police Dept. et al
| David L Reed |
| Christoher Cannon, North Las Vegas Police Dept., Chris David Alimboyah and Justin Miller |
| 2:2018cv01847 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time; Payment of filing fees or IFP due 12/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Extension of Time (First Request) re IFP deadline per #4 Order by Plaintiff David L Reed. (SLD)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER denying #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel ; Payment of filing fees or IFP due within 30 days of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: IFP to P - JM)
|
|
Filing 3
ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (JM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff David L Reed. (JM)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David L Reed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(JM)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (RT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
