Tchouanang et al v. Republic Services, Inc.
| Julienne Tiabu, Christelle Laure Tchouanang and Jacques Olivier Tchouanang |
| Republic Services, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv01875 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Peggy A Leen |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Christelle Laure Tchouanang, Jacques Olivier Tchouanang, Julienne Tiabu. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Sandoval, Michael) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #7 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant Republic Services, Inc.. Replies due by 11/14/2018. (Barron, David) |
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Republic Services, Inc.. (Barron, David) |
Filing 9
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file their certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 11/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 8 ERRATA to #7 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiffs Christelle Laure Tchouanang, Jacques Olivier Tchouanang, Julienne Tiabu. (Sandoval, Michael) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiffs Christelle Laure Tchouanang, Jacques Olivier Tchouanang, Julienne Tiabu. Responses due by 11/7/2018. (Sandoval, Michael) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Republic Services, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/23/2018.(Barron, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Republic Services, Inc.. (Barron, David) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/1/2018. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/27/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/12/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 10/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Republic Services, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Barron, David) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Disctric Court Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-18-777397-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5259274) by Republic Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barron, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
