Jensen v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
| Duane Jensen |
| Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department |
| 2:2018cv01906 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| Contract: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice. All pending motions [ECF No. 4] are DENIED as moot. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal Stipulation and Order for Dismissal Without Prejudice by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. (Crosby, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Duane Jensen. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department served on 10/4/2018, answer due 10/25/2018. (MMM) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/25/2018. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #4 Motion to Dismiss,. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Crosby, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Responses due by 11/8/2018. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/9/2018. (Crosby, Nicholas) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (MMM) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department re #1 Complaint. (MMM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (Filing fee $400) by Duane Jensen. Proof of service due by 12/31/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 7 - Modified on 10/2/2018 to restrict access pursuant to LR IC 6-1 (MMM)., #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 receipt #NVLAS059585)(MMM) |
| Case assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jensen v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Crosby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Duane Jensen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
