Davis v. Berryhill
| Teniya G. Davis |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv01968 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 7017 3380 0000 4606 0337 re #5 Summons Issued as to USA, #4 Complaint. (ADR) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT 7017 3380 0000 4606 0320 re #5 Summons Issued as to USA, #4 Complaint. (ADR) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Ben A. Porter on behalf of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Porter, Ben) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #4 Complaint. Nevada Attorney General served on 10/17/2018, answer due 12/16/2018. (ADR) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/16/2018. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT 7017 3380 0000 4606 0337 and 7017 3380 0000 4606 00320 re #5 Summons Issued as to USA, #4 Complaint. (ADR) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (cc: USM - ADR) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill by Teniya G. Davis. Proof of service due by 1/13/2019.(cc: USM - ADR) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court file #1 -1 the Complaint and serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint #1 -1 by certified mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/15/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - ADR)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Teniya G. Davis. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Safa, Cyrus) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Teniya G. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Safa, Cyrus) |
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (EDS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teniya G. Davis | |
| Represented By: | Gerald Welt |
| Represented By: | Cyrus Safa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Ben A. Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
