Acuna v. Berryhill
| Paulina Acuna |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv02042 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RETURN CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT as to Atty General re #5 Certified Mail Receipt. (JM) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Paulina Acuna. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Harris, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 RETURN CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT as to SSA re #5 Certified Mail Receipt. (JM) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/29/2018. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Carolyn Beth Chen on behalf of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Chen, Carolyn) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #3 Complaint and #4 Summons Issued as to US Attorney. Sserved on 10/25/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (SLD) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF MAIL RECEIPT 7017 3380 0000 4606 0344 and 7017 3380 0000 4606 0351 re #3 Complaint, #4 Summons Issued as to USA. (ADR) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (cc: USM-AUSA Nevada -ADR) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/25/2018) (ADR). |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Paulina Acuna. Proof of service due by 1/23/2019.(ADR) |
Filing 2
ORDER Granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint and shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/25/2018.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - ADR)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (RFJ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Paulina Acuna. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Harris, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Acuna v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paulina Acuna | |
| Represented By: | Joshua R Harris |
| Represented By: | Richard A Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn Beth Chen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
