Brokaw et al v. Ditech Financal LLC et al
| Thomas Brokaw and Crystal Brokaw |
| Equifax Information Services LLC and Ditech Financial LLC |
| 2:2018cv02140 |
| November 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Substitute Attorney Jeremy J. Thompson in for Attorney Bradley T. Austin by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Filing 12
ORDER Granting #11 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (Second Request). Ditech Financial LLC answer due 1/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Ditech Financial LLC. (Kolkoski, Danielle) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Equifax Information Services LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC added. (Austin, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, and Affirmative Defenses filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/24/2019.(Austin, Bradley) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Equifax Information Services LLC answer due 12/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 7 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC. (Austin, Bradley) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Ditech Financial LLC answer due 12/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Ditech Financial LLC. (Kolkoski, Danielle) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas Brokaw, Crystal Brokaw re #3 Summons Issued. All Defendants. (Fox, Erik-Anthony) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Crystal Brokaw, Thomas Brokaw. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Fox, Erik-Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5312277) by Thomas Brokaw, Crystal Brokaw. Proof of service due by 2/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Ditech, #3 Summons for Equifax)(Fox, Erik-Anthony) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
