Meza De Munoz v. Whitaker
Jeanne M. Kent, Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker and Kirsten Nielson |
Luz Isela Meza De Munoz |
2:2018cv02332 |
December 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Peggy A Leen |
Naturalization Application |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #1 Petition for Judicial Review, by Petitioner Luz Isela Meza De Munoz. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Ramsey, Brian) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Docket Correction to 3 QC Notice, : Docketed in this case in error by clerks office and is therefore terminated. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 3 Filed in error. Document terminated. CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #1 , #2 . (DKJ). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #1 Petition for Judicial Review by Petitioner Luz Isela Meza De Munoz. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USCIS Decision on N-336) (Ramsey, Brian) |
Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (JM) |
Filing 1 VIEW Corrected Image #5 as to PETITION for Judicial Review (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5349406) by Defendant Matthew G. Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USCIS Decision)(Ramsey, Brian) Modified on 12/14/2018 (RFJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.