Streeter v. Izadi et al
| Mark Streeter |
| Armani Izadi, Sancho Van Ryan, Glow Threads, Inc., Sancho Jinadasa, Alexander Izadi and Armani |
| 2:2018cv02335 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Glow Threads, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Mark Streeter. (Pitegoff, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Mark Streeter. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Pitegoff, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Armani Izadi, Sancho Van Ryan. (JM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5350752) by Mark Streeter. Proof of service due by 3/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons, #3 Summons Summons)(Pitegoff, Jeffrey) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
