Matticx v. James River Insurance Company
| Devon Matticx |
| James River Insurance Company |
| 2:2019cv00004 |
| January 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Miranda M Du |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by James River Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Christensen, Jared) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/2/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 1/17/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 2/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-18-785122-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5377294) by James River Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Civil Complaint, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Service)(Christensen, Jared) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
