Herndon v. Henderson Police Department et al
| James M. Herndon |
| D. Russo, E. Vega, M. Gillis, A. Nelson, D. Nerbonne, Henderson Police Department and L. Good |
| 2:2019cv00018 |
| January 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER Granting 147 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Replies due by 1/5/2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/28/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 119 Motion for Summary Judgement is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER OREDERED that Plaintiff's 120 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff 's 128 Counter Motion to Strike is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 132 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages is GRANTED as unopposed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close the case and enter judgment for Defendants. This case is now closed. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/23/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 129 Stipulation Re: 123 Response to 120 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 4/4/2023. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/30/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 124 Stipulation Re: 119 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 3/24/2023. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/17/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER denying as moot 73 Objection/Appeal Magistrate Judge Order/Ruling LR IB 3-1; ORDER denying 80 Motion to Amend/Correct; ORDER denying 81 Motion to Amend/Correct; ORDER finding as moot 90 Motion for Leave to File Document. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/20/2021. Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 86 Stipulation to Reply Re: 80 , 81 Motions for Summary Judgment, Replies due by 6/2/2021. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER. Settlement Conference reset for 7/19/2021 at 01:00 PM. To the extent either side would like to submit a supplemental settlement statement, it must be submitted to the undersigned's box in the Clerk's Office, by noon on July 12, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/12/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Settlement Conference is continued to 1:00 PM on 5/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 67 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Deadlines Re: 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/9/2020. Replies due by 1/18/2021. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/1/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 59 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Deadlines Re: 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 12/2/2020. Replies due by 12/21/2020. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 41 Motion to Compel; ORDER granting 43 Motion to Extend Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/7/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER. The Court defers ruling at this time on the 43 motion to extend. Instead, Plaintiff must respond to the motion to extend by 9/24/2020. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to file a reply to the 41 motion to compel to address the arguments raised in the proposed responsive brief, such reply must also be filed by 9/24/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER. The Court declines to give the 41 Motion to Compel emergency consideration. Instead, the motion will be briefed pursuant to the schedule previously provided, see Docket No. 25 , and will be decided in the ordinary course. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Re: 34 Order on Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Re: 28 Stipulation. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on that stipulation for 9:00 a.m. on 2/24/20. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Re: 23 Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER. The Court hereby SETS a scheduling hearing for 2:30 p.m. on 9/17/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that individual defendants must file a certificate of interested parties no later than 8/7/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
