Roash v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
Riki Roash |
Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut |
2:2019cv00035 |
January 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Peggy A Leen |
Gloria M Navarro |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION to Substitute Attorney Dylan P. Todd in for Attorney Casey G. Perkins by Defendant Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. (Todd, Dylan) |
Filing 12 Joint STATUS REPORT re Removal by Defendant Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. (Perkins, Casey) |
Filing 11 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (MR) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER re #9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 7/10/2019. Motions due by 8/9/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Riki Roash (Bowen, Jerome) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Riki Roash. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Bowen, Jerome) |
Filing 7 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file a certificate of interested parties which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 2/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. (Perkins, Casey) |
Filing 5 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/25/2019.(Perkins, Casey) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/7/2019. By Deputy Clerk: Aaron Blazevich.This case has been assigned to the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Chief Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/4/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 1/19/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 2/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Other Affiliate Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate The Travelers Companies Inc., Other Affiliate THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY for Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut added. (Perkins, Casey) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-18-783315-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5381730) by Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perkins, Casey) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Roash v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut | |
Represented By: | Casey G. Perkins |
Represented By: | Amy M. Samberg |
Represented By: | Dylan P Todd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Riki Roash | |
Represented By: | Jerome R. Bowen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.