Davis v. PacificSource Health Plans, Inc.
| Mitchell Davis |
| PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00045 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #8 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #5 Amended Complaint (First Request). PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. answer due 3/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 8 First STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to Answer by Defendant PacificSource Health Plans, Inc.. (Bestick, Alissa) |
| Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. on 2/6/2019 executed by Mitchell Davis. (Mott, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. re #5 Amended Complaint. (ADR) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Mitchell Davis. Adds and removes parties. Proof of service due by 5/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Mott, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/8/2019. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Mitchell Davis. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Mott, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5383561) by Mitchell Davis. Proof of service due by 4/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Mott, Joseph) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mitchell Davis | |
| Represented By: | Scott E Lundy |
| Represented By: | Joseph Nathan Mott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PacificSource Health Plans, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alissa N. Bestick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
