Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. v. 3 Day Blinds, LLC
| Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. |
| 3 Day Blinds, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00113 |
| January 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Carl W Hoffman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. re #1 Complaint,. 3 Day Blinds, LLC served on 1/30/2019, answer due 2/20/2019. (Schriever, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc.. (Schriever, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/28/2019. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate Polywood Fabrication, Inc., Other Affiliate Sunburst Shutters Las Vegas, Inc. for Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. added. (Schriever, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 3 Day Blinds, LLC re #1 Complaint. (ADR) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc.. (Schriever, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 AO 120 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ADR) |
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (ADR) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc.. (Schriever, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3 Day Blinds, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5399476) by Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc.. Proof of service due by 4/20/2019.(Schriever, Matthew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. v. 3 Day Blinds, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sunburst Shutters Nevada, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew K Schriever |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 3 Day Blinds, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
