Froelich v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
Michael D. Froelich |
PHH Mortgage Corporation |
2:2019cv00175 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cam Ferenbach |
Andrew P Gordon |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #7 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Michael D. Froelich. Replies due by 4/2/2019. (Miller, Shawn) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by PHH Mortgage Corporation that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Ocwen Financial Corporation for PHH Mortgage Corporation added. (Habermas, Regina) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. Responses due by 3/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Miller, Christina) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). PHH Mortgage Corporation answer due 3/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Miller, Christina) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/30/2019. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PHH Mortgage Corporation re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Michael D. Froelich. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5409787) by Michael D. Froelich. Proof of service due by 4/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons PHH)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Froelich v. PHH Mortgage Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael D. Froelich | |
Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
Represented By: | Shawn Wayne Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation | |
Represented By: | Christina Miller |
Represented By: | Regina A. Habermas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.