Robison v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Monique Robison |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
2:2019cv00195 |
February 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Nancy J Koppe |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (MR) |
Filing 11 ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule For Discovery Motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order and Denying as moot #7 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/29/2019. Motions due by 11/28/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/27/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Monique Robison (Hengstler, Joel) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #7 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b). Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 7 PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Monique Robison (Kane, Michael) |
Filing 6 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report Regarding Removal by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Arata, Michael) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Court minutes)(Arata, Michael) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Phillips, Robert) |
Filing 3 ORDER that Defendant must file a certificate of interested parties no later than 2/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/1/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/16/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, Case Number A-18-782864-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5414262) by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Kuhls, Timothy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.