Muric-Dorado vs. Dzurenda et al
Ramon Muric-Dorado |
Mary Flores, Waters, Nevada Department of Corrections, James G. Cox, Mr. Baca, Ken Bradshaw, Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners, Nancy Porter, Moses, James Dzureneda, Division of Parole & Probation for Nev., Susan Jackson, Connie S. Bisbee, Peterson and Tony Corda |
2:2019cv00238 |
February 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Nancy J Koppe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Muric-Dorado. (ADR) |
Filing 3 ORDER Denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Payment of filing fees or file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis due 3/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/11/2019.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Encl.: application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner - ADR) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (ADR) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION and Declaration in Support for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff Ramon Muric-Dorado. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(ADR) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.