Lopez v. Homan et al
| Paul Lopez |
| Stephen F. Sisolak, William A. Gittere, Timothy E. Filson, Aaron D. Ford, Barbara K. Cegavske, Adam P. Laxalt, U.S. Federal Judge Brian E. Sandoval, David M. Tristan, Scott R. Manning, Robert V. Huston, Ronald D. Bryant, William Reubart, Dennis A. Homan, Director James E. Dzurenda, James E. Dzurenda and Brian E. Sandoval |
| 2:2019cv00314 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Civil Case Administratively Terminated. Case opened in wrong division by counsel. Case transferred to Northern Division under case number 3:19-cv-00098. Counsel advised to file using this case number for all future filings. (RFJ) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Paul Lopez. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Barrick, Travis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5439298) by Paul Lopez. Proof of service due by 5/21/2019.(Barrick, Travis) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
