Peters v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff: Laura Peters
Defendant: Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv00874
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Referring Judge: Gloria M Navarro
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT re: Removal; filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Roose, Melissa)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Roose, Melissa)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Laura Peters. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Ladah, Ramzy)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/24/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 6/8/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 6/23/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Roose, Melissa)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-793704-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5561969) by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Roose, Melissa) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE Violation of the Local Rules. ERROR : Documents #1 , #2 , #3 and #4 were not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b) by attorneys Melissa J. Roose and Troy Clark. Please note the signatory must be the attorney who electronically files the document. Attorneys are advised to file documents in accordance with the local rules regarding electronic filing. (no image attached) (RFJ)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding violation of the Federal and Local Rules and Attorney Action Required to document #1 : ERROR: Filing fee not paid and wrong event selected by attorney Troy Clark. CORRECTION: Attorney Troy Clark is advised to file the pleading using the correct Petition for Removal event in accordance with 28 U.S. Code 1446 and LR IC 2-2(c). Attorney is also advised to pay the required filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S. Code 1914. Attorney is advised until such time as the filing fee is paid no Judges will be assigned. Document #1 terminated as filed in error, pursuant to LR IC 7-1. (no image attached) (RFJ)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (SLD)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Clark, Troy) Document not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) and LR IC 5-1 by attorneys Melissa J. Roose and Troy Clark. (RFJ).
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Clark, Troy) Document not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) and LR IC 5-1 by attorneys Melissa J. Roose and Troy Clark. (RFJ).
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Client Verification by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Clark, Troy) Document not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) and LR IC 5-1 by attorneys Melissa J. Roose and Troy Clark. (RFJ).
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ERROR: Filing fee not paid and wrong event selected by attorney Troy Clark. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to refile document #1 using the correct event pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c) and pay the required filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S. Code 1914 (a). CLIENT VERIFICATION by attorney Troy Clark on behalf of Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Clark, Troy) Document #1 terminated as filed in error, pursuant to LR IC 7-1on 5/24/2019 (RFJ). Document not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d) and LR IC 5-1 by attorneys Melissa J. Roose and Troy Clark. (RFJ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Represented By: Carissa C Christensen
Represented By: Melissa J. Roose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Peters
Represented By: Ramzy P Ladah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?