Cook v. Thomas et al
Plaintiff: Ashley Cook
Defendant: Harold Thomas, Keolis Transit Services LLC and Keolis Transit America, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv00889
Filed: May 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Carl W Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Certified Copy of Order and Docket Sheet Sent to State Court - ADR)
May 28, 2019 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/28/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 6/12/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 6/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 28, 2019 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman. (SLD)
May 28, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Keolis Transit Services LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 7/12/2019.(Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Keolis Transit Services LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lowry, Michael)
May 28, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-793832-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5563791) by Keolis Transit Services LLC. Proof of service due by 7/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Demand Letter)(Lowry, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Thomas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harold Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keolis Transit Services LLC
Represented By: Michael P Lowry
Represented By: Amanda Anne Ebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keolis Transit America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Cook
Represented By: Farhan R Naqvi
Represented By: Elizabeth E Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?