Secrist v. Richland Holdings, Inc. dba AcctCorp of Southern Nevada et al
| Kym R. Secrist |
| Richland Holdings Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00891 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate Vantagescore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. added. (Sharples, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/5/2019.(Sharples, Andrew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kym R. Secrist. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 5/31/2019, answer due 6/21/2019. (Hernandez, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kym R. Secrist. Richland Holdings Inc. served on 6/4/2019, answer due 6/25/2019. (Hernandez, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kym R. Secrist. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hernandez, Kevin) |
Filing 4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1-1(c) no later than 6/3/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Richland Holdings Inc. re #1 Complaint. (JQC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JQC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5563890) by Kym R. Secrist. Proof of service due by 8/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Richland Holdings, Inc., #3 Summons Experian Information Solutions, Inc.)(Hernandez, Kevin) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
