Ditech Financial LLC v. Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc.
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC |
Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. |
2:2019cv00968 |
June 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
James C Mahan |
Brenda Weksler |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint. Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. answer due 8/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 6/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc.. (Wong, Wing Yan) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wong, Wing Yan) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ditech Financial LLC re #1 Complaint,,. Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Miller, Christina) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Ditech Financial LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Walter Investment Management Corp. for Ditech Financial LLC added. (Miller, Christina) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (ADR) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Ditech Financial LLC. (Miller, Christina) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (ADR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5578589) by DITECH FINANCIAL LLC. Proof of service due by 9/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Christina) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ditech Financial LLC v. Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DITECH FINANCIAL LLC | |
Represented By: | Christina Miller |
Represented By: | Matthew S Carter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Park Bonanza East Townhouse Owners Association, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Wing Yan Wong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.