James v. City of Henderson
Jeffrey Alan James |
City of Henderson |
2:2019cv01207 |
July 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
James C Mahan |
Brenda Weksler |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Stipulation; Re: #5 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/18/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 9 Second STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) for Plaintiff to Respond re #5 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant City of Henderson. (Kemble, Brandon) |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #7 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: #5 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 9/3/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #5 Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan James. (Hill, Melanie) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #5 . Attorney Nicholas G. Vaskov is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant City of Henderson. Responses due by 8/1/2019. (Kemble, Brandon) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant City of Henderson. (Kemble, Brandon) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by City of Henderson. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kemble, Brandon) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 7/11/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/26/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-789531-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5619952) by City of Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kemble, Brandon) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: James v. City of Henderson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Alan James | |
Represented By: | Melanie A. Hill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Henderson | |
Represented By: | Brandon P Kemble |
Represented By: | Nicholas G. Vaskov |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.