Johnson v. Slaughter et al
| Vaughn Nathaniel Johnson |
| Charles R. Slaughter, II and Celedon Trucking Services, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv01245 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| James C Mahan |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Discovery Hearing held on 9/11/2019 before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Crtrm Administrator: Jeff Miller; Pla Counsel: Nadia Von Magdenko, Esq.; Def Counsel: Ty Hanseen, Esq.; Time of Hearing: 2:00pm; Electronic Court Recorder Operator: Liberty/CRD; Recording start and end times: 1:57:40 - 2:01:13; Courtroom: 3B; The Court scheduled these proceedings regarding Counsels' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order #9 . The Court hears the remarks of Counsel. IT IS ORDERED: Counsels' Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order #9 is GRANTED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JAM) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 9/6/2019. Re: #9 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery Hearing set for 9/11/2019 at 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LAA) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by Defendant Celedon Trucking Services, Inc. (Hanseen, Tye) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Vaughn Nathaniel Johnson. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Korrey, David) |
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Celedon Trucking Services, Inc.. (Hanseen, Tye) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal, Defendant Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.'s Answer to Complaint filed by Celedon Trucking Services, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/8/2019.(Hanseen, Tye) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 AMENDED STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Celedon Trucking Services, Inc.. (Hanseen, Tye) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Celedon Trucking Services, Inc.. (Hanseen, Tye) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Celedon Trucking Services, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hanseen, Tye) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 7/17/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/1/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District, Case Number A-19-796726-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5627221) by Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanseen, Tye) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
