Egbert v. Cenlar Federal Savings Bank et al
Kent Egbert |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Cenlar Federal Savings Bank and TransUnion, LLC |
2:2019cv01324 |
July 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
George Foley |
Elayna J Youchah |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Defendant TransUnion, LLC. Responses due by 10/3/2019. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Equifax Information Services, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC added. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 10/26/2019.(Thompson, Jeremy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting #8 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: #1 Complaint. Equifax Information Services, LLC's answer due 9/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 8/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #7 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: #1 Complaint. TransUnion, LLC's answer due 9/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 8/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 8 FIRST STIPULATION for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint, filed by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Filing 7 FIRST STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME re #1 Complaint, filed by Defendant TransUnion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by TransUnion, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion for TransUnion, LLC added. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jennifer Rebecca Bergh on behalf of Defendant TransUnion, LLC. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE that due to the retirement of U.S. Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr., this case is reassigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:19-cv-01324-JAD-EJY. (no image attached) (JM) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (SLD) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kent Egbert. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5644716) by Kent Egbert. Proof of service due by 10/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Cenlar, #3 Summons Equifax, #4 Summons TransUnion)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.