Hines v. Williams et al
Case Number: 2:2019cv01465
Filed: September 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 27 the respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, under Circuit Rule 22-3(a), the clerk of the court shall refer this action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the clerk of the court administratively close this action. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USCA - MR)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Extend Time re 27 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Responses due by 4/5/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 25 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time re 24 Order (Second Request). Respondents answer due 2/18/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER Granting 23 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time Nunc pro Tunc.Respondents will have up to and including 1/19/2021, to file a response to 22 the first amended petition. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Extend Time to file First Amended Petition (First Request). Amended Petition due by 9/14/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court file 1 -1 the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 3 the motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender is appointe d provisionally as counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk add Aaron Ford, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for the respondents. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Petitioner - MR)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Extend Time re 4 Order (Second Request). The petitioner will have through 1/24/2020 to comply. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting 5 Motion to Extend Time re 4 Order (First Request). The petitioner will have through 12/10/2019 to comply. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner Tony Hines must file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank application form for incarcerated litigants. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hines v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?