Seisdedos v. U.S. Marshals Service, District of Nevada et al
| Diane M Seisdedos |
| U.S. Marshals Service, District of Nevada and U.S. Department of Justice, District of Nevada |
| 2:2019cv01503 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/28/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 9/12/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-19-799532-C, by U.S. Department of Justice. Proof of service due by 10/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons & Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woolf, Mark) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
