Vasquez v. Desert Aire Wellness, LLC
Pete Vasquez, III |
Desert Aire Wellness, LLC d/b/a Sahara Wellness and Desert Aire Wellness, LLC |
2:2019cv01622 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Brenda Weksler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Pete Vasquez, III. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Holman, Kristina) |
Filing 3 NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (JM) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Desert Aire Wellness, LLC. (JM) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (JM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Desert Aire Wellness, LLC d/b/a Sahara Wellness (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5702209) by Pete Vasquez, III. Proof of service due by 12/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Holman, Kristina) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.