Cenegenics, LLC v. Medical Health Institute, LLC
Cenegenics, LLC |
Medical Health Institute LLC and Medical Health Institute |
2:2019cv01674 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Jennifer A Dorsey |
Nancy J Koppe |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Meghan C. Murphey and approving Attorney Michael D. Rounds as Designation of Local Counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/2/2019. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 8 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Meghan C. Murphey and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Michael D. Rounds (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-5722472) by Plaintiff Cenegenics, LLC. (Rounds, Michael) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Medical Health Institute LLC re #1 Complaint. (SLD) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff Cenegenics, LLC. (Fetaz, Maximilien) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Cenegenics, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Fetaz, Maximilien) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/26/2019. Each non-governmental party is required to file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1-1(c). Plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, Plaintiff must file a certificate of interested parties no later than September 30, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Meghan C. Murphey to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. For your convenience, click on the following link to obtain the form from the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Upon approval of the Verified Petition, counsel is required to register for the Court's Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system and the electronic service of documents. Please visit the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 11/9/2019. (no image attached) (SLD) |
Filing 2 AO 120 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent or trademark. E-mailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibits A and B) (SLD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medical Health Institute, LLC d/b/a and/or aka Medical Health Institute (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5715318) by Cenegenics, LLC. Proof of service due by 12/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Index Index, #2 Exhibit A-B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fetaz, Maximilien) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.